Screener
EFO vs SCZ
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCZ costs 0.55% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than EFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFO covers europe markets; SCZ covers global ex us.
- EFO follows a leveraged strategy; SCZ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFO | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $14.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.85% | 14.50% |
| Max drawdown | -63.52% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFO and SCZ
Explore further