Screener
EFO vs IEFA
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE vs iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.88% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFO covers europe markets; IEFA covers global ex us.
- EFO follows a leveraged strategy; IEFA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFO | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $180.7B |
| Since | 2009 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +24.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.85% | 15.07% |
| Max drawdown | -63.52% | -34.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFO and IEFA
Explore further