Screener
EFRA vs DMXF
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.35% less per year.
- DMXF is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFRA | DMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $992M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 4.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.09% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -34.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFRA and DMXF
Explore further