Screener
EFV vs LRGF
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.23% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than LRGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFV follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFV | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30.0B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2005 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.83% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.25% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -43.16% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFV and LRGF
Explore further