Screener
EGLE vs RWJ
Global X S&P 500 U.S. Revenue Leaders ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- EGLE costs 0.20% less per year.
- RWJ is significantly larger than EGLE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EGLE | RWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 1.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.5% | +40.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 19.62% |
| Max drawdown | -9.78% | -51.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EGLE and RWJ
Explore further