Screener
EGLE vs RWL
Global X S&P 500 U.S. Revenue Leaders ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- EGLE costs 0.20% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than EGLE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EGLE | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.5% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -9.78% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EGLE and RWL
Explore further