Screener
EINC vs MLPD
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- EINC costs 0.14% less per year.
- EINC is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EINC follows a index tracking strategy; MLPD uses option income.
- EINC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EINC | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $29M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.53% | 7.34% |
| Max drawdown | -68.85% | -12.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EINC and MLPD
Explore further