Screener
EINC vs PIPE
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- EINC costs 0.29% less per year.
- EINC follows a index tracking strategy; PIPE uses active selection.
- EINC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EINC | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $64M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.53% | 14.18% |
| Max drawdown | -68.85% | -15.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EINC and PIPE
Explore further