Screener
EINC vs MLPA
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs Global X MLP ETF
Key differences
- EINC costs 0.31% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than EINC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EINC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EINC | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 6.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.6% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.4% | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.53% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -68.85% | -74.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EINC and MLPA
Explore further