Screener
PIPE vs EIPX
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF vs FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
Key differences
- PIPE costs 0.20% less per year.
- EIPX is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PIPE follows a active selection strategy; EIPX uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIPE | EIPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $532M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | 2.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.18% | 11.12% |
| Max drawdown | -15.69% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIPE and EIPX
Explore further