Screener
EINC vs VRIG
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.16% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than EINC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EINC is classified as equity, while VRIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EINC follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EINC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EINC | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.6% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.4% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.53% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -68.85% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EINC and VRIG
Explore further