Screener
VRIG vs PGX
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.20% less per year.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; PGX uses index tracking.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $3.9B |
| Since | 2016 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 6.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.90 | 0.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 6.15% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -34.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and PGX
Explore further