Screener
EIPX vs PIPE
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- PIPE costs 0.20% less per year.
- EIPX is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EIPX follows a index tracking strategy; PIPE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EIPX | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $532M | $64M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.61% | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.12% | 14.18% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -15.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EIPX and PIPE
Explore further