Screener
PIPE vs EINC
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF vs VanEck Energy Income ETF
Key differences
- EINC costs 0.29% less per year.
- PIPE follows a active selection strategy; EINC uses index tracking.
- EINC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIPE | EINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $147M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +30.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.18% | 14.53% |
| Max drawdown | -15.69% | -68.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIPE and EINC
Explore further