Screener
EMBD vs EMTL
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.26% less per year.
- EMBD follows a active selection strategy; EMTL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | EMTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $90M |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 4.99% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 2.22% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -22.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and EMTL
Explore further