Screener
EMBD vs EBND
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
Key differences
- EBND costs 0.09% less per year.
- EBND is significantly larger than EMBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBD follows a active selection strategy; EBND uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | EBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 5.72% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 6.93% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -29.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and EBND
Explore further