Screener
EMBX vs FFEM
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
EMBX is a fixed income ETF, while FFEM is an equity ETF. EMBX charges 0.76% a year and FFEM 0.60%.
- EMBX is a fixed income fund, while FFEM is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFEM costs 0.16% less per year.
- EMBX is much larger than FFEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBX | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $43M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 5.33% | 1.20% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.2% | +57.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.07% | 23.24% |
| Max drawdown | -37.55% | -16.29% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.