Screener
EMC vs XCNY
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.46% less per year.
- EMC is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMC follows a active selection strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
- EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMC | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $9M |
| Since | 2010 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.7% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.21% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -18.38% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMC and XCNY
Explore further