Screener
EMCR vs PBD
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- EMCR costs 0.60% less per year.
- PBD is significantly larger than EMCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMCR covers emerging markets markets; PBD covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMCR | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $208M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.7% | +88.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 23.23% |
| Max drawdown | -34.28% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMCR and PBD
Explore further