Screener
PBD vs EMCS
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
Key differences
- EMCS costs 0.60% less per year.
- EMCS is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBD covers global markets; EMCS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | EMCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $912M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 21.77% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -44.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and EMCS
Explore further