Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMCS vs MIDE

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF vs Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF

EMCS

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF

Xtrackers

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$912M

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF

Xtrackers

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$4M

Key differences

  • EMCS is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMCS covers emerging markets markets; MIDE covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

EMCSMIDE
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$912M$4M
Since20182021
Dividend yield1.44%1.37%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+50.1%+26.9%
CAGR 3Y+24.2%+16.3%
CAGR 5Y+7.5%+7.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.020.73
Volatility 1Y21.77%15.95%
Max drawdown-44.86%-24.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMCS and MIDE