Screener
EMES vs OSEA
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.10% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMES | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $497M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.51% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -12.98% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMES and OSEA
Explore further