Screener
EMGF vs FLRG
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF vs Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.11% less per year.
- EMGF is significantly larger than FLRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMGF covers emerging markets markets; FLRG covers north america.
- EMGF follows a index enhanced strategy; FLRG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMGF | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $283M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.8% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.44% | 10.28% |
| Max drawdown | -40.23% | -19.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMGF and FLRG
Explore further