Screener
FLRG vs ROAM
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.29% less per year.
- FLRG covers north america markets; ROAM covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRG | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $106M |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.28% | 14.41% |
| Max drawdown | -19.64% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRG and ROAM
Explore further