Screener
ROAM vs EMMF
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
Key differences
- ROAM follows a index tracking strategy; EMMF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | EMMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $167M |
| Since | 2015 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 2.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.41% | 16.07% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -32.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and EMMF
Explore further