Screener
EMHC vs SPEM
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.16% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than EMHC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMHC is classified as fixed income, while SPEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, SPEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMHC | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $252M | $17.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 6.13% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.6% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.42% | 15.88% |
| Max drawdown | -28.03% | -36.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMHC and SPEM
Explore further