Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMHC vs XCNY

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

EMHC

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.23%

Fund size

$252M

XCNY

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • EMHC is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMHC is classified as fixed income, while XCNY is equity — different risk/return profiles.

Side-by-side comparison

EMHCXCNY
Annual cost (TER)0.23%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$252M$9M
Since20212024
Dividend yield6.13%2.41%
Asset classfixed incomeequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+11.8%+32.6%
CAGR 3Y+8.6%N/A
CAGR 5Y+1.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.69N/A
Volatility 1Y5.42%16.39%
Max drawdown-28.03%-19.70%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMHC and XCNY