Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SPEM vs EBND

State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF

SPEM

State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$17.3B

EBND

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$2.3B

Key differences

  • SPEM costs 0.23% less per year.
  • SPEM is significantly larger than EBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SPEM is classified as equity, while EBND is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • Over the last 3 years, SPEM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SPEMEBND
Annual cost (TER)0.07%0.30%
Fund size (AUM)$17.3B$2.3B
Since20072011
Dividend yield2.58%5.72%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+30.3%+5.8%
CAGR 3Y+19.0%+5.0%
CAGR 5Y+6.6%+0.2%
Sharpe 3Y0.950.21
Volatility 1Y15.88%6.93%
Max drawdown-36.06%-29.50%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SPEM and EBND