Screener
EMLP vs PIPE
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund vs Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- PIPE costs 0.20% less per year.
- EMLP is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMLP follows a index tracking strategy; PIPE uses active selection.
- EMLP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMLP | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.1B | $64M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.69% | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.5% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.80% | 14.18% |
| Max drawdown | -43.61% | -15.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMLP and PIPE
Explore further