Screener
EMM vs REMG
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- EMM follows a active selection strategy; REMG uses index tracking.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMM | REMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $95M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +54.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.25% | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.99% | -14.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMM and REMG
Explore further