Screener
EMNT vs MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- EMNT costs 0.12% less per year.
- MINT is significantly larger than EMNT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMNT follows a index tracking strategy; MINT uses active selection.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMNT | MINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $15.5B |
| Since | 2019 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.4% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.02 | 4.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.42% | 0.27% |
| Max drawdown | -2.28% | -4.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMNT and MINT
Explore further