Screener
EMNT vs BOND
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- EMNT costs 0.30% less per year.
- BOND is significantly larger than EMNT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMNT follows a index tracking strategy; BOND uses active selection.
- BOND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMNT | BOND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $7.9B |
| Since | 2019 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 5.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.4% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.02 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.42% | 4.00% |
| Max drawdown | -2.28% | -19.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMNT and BOND
Explore further