Screener
EMOP vs BCFN
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Baron Financials ETF
Key differences
Both EMOP and BCFN are equity ETFs. EMOP charges 0.70% a year and BCFN 0.80%. The main difference: EMOP covers emerging markets; BCFN covers global markets.
- EMOP covers emerging markets; BCFN covers global markets.
- EMOP costs 0.10% less per year.
- EMOP is much larger than BCFN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMOP | BCFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $47M |
| Since | 1995 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -20.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.