Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMOP vs EMM

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

EMOP

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

AllianceBernstein

Annual cost

0.70%

Fund size

$1.9B

EMM

Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.66%

Fund size

$58M

Key differences

  • EMOP is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMOPEMM
Annual cost (TER)0.70%0.66%
Fund size (AUM)$1.9B$58M
Since19952010
Dividend yield1.64%0.76%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+54.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+20.5%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.90
Volatility 1Y21.25%
Max drawdown-12.87%-21.99%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMOP and EMM