Screener
EMPB vs FFLS
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
- FFLS costs 0.61% less per year.
- EMPB follows a active selection strategy; FFLS uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMPB | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.21% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $42M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 0.13% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | -0.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.41% | 8.87% |
| Max drawdown | -7.55% | -11.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMPB and FFLS
Explore further