Screener
EMSF vs GEM
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both EMSF and GEM are equity ETFs. EMSF charges 0.79% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: EMSF follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- GEM costs 0.44% less per year.
- GEM is much larger than EMSF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | +41.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.56% | 20.62% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -37.02% |
Similar to EMSF and GEM
Explore further