Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEM vs MEMX

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$50M

Key differences

Both GEM and MEMX are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and MEMX 0.79%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; MEMX uses active selection.

  • GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; MEMX uses active selection.
  • GEM costs 0.44% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than MEMX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$50M
Since20152023
Dividend yield1.85%1.55%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex enhancedactive selection
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+56.3%
CAGR 3Y+21.9%+24.5%
CAGR 5Y+6.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.001.12
Volatility 1Y20.62%22.75%
Max drawdown-37.02%-19.27%

Similar to GEM and MEMX