Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEM vs MEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

MEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$57M

Key differences

Both GEM and MEM are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and MEM 0.79%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; MEM uses active selection.

  • GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; MEM uses active selection.
  • GEM costs 0.44% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than MEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMMEM
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$57M
Since20152022
Dividend yield1.85%2.78%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyindex enhancedactive selection
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+41.2%
CAGR 3Y+21.9%+21.4%
CAGR 5Y+6.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.000.94
Volatility 1Y20.62%21.64%
Max drawdown-37.02%-19.10%

Similar to GEM and MEM