Screener
EMSF vs NUMV
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
Both EMSF and NUMV are equity ETFs. EMSF charges 0.79% a year and NUMV 0.31%. The main difference: EMSF follows a active selection strategy; NUMV uses index tracking.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; NUMV uses index tracking.
- EMSF covers emerging markets; NUMV covers North America.
- NUMV costs 0.48% less per year.
- NUMV is much larger than EMSF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUMV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | NUMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46M | $540M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.56% | 12.53% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -43.46% |
Similar to EMSF and NUMV
Explore further