Screener
EMSF vs EMGF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- EMGF costs 0.53% less per year.
- EMGF is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; EMGF uses index enhanced.
- EMGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.8% | +46.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.21% | 19.44% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -40.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMSF and EMGF
Explore further