Screener
EMSF vs RNEM
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
Key differences
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; RNEM uses index tracking.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | RNEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $17M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.8% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.21% | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -38.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMSF and RNEM
Explore further