Screener
RNEM vs MEMX
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
Key differences
- RNEM follows a index tracking strategy; MEMX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNEM | MEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $45M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.4% | +62.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -38.37% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNEM and MEMX
Explore further