Screener
RNEM vs MEMS
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF
Key differences
- RNEM costs 0.13% less per year.
- RNEM follows a index tracking strategy; MEMS uses active selection.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNEM | MEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $22M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 2.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.4% | +31.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | 20.96% |
| Max drawdown | -38.37% | -22.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNEM and MEMS
Explore further