Screener
EMSF vs ROUS
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
Key differences
- ROUS costs 0.60% less per year.
- ROUS is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMSF covers emerging markets markets; ROUS covers north america.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; ROUS uses index tracking.
- ROUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | ROUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $587M |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.8% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.21% | 11.43% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -35.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMSF and ROUS
Explore further