Screener
EMSF vs RODM
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Key differences
- RODM costs 0.50% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMSF covers emerging markets markets; RODM covers global.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; RODM uses index enhanced.
- RODM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 2.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.8% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.21% | 10.77% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -35.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMSF and RODM
Explore further