Screener
EMSF vs ROAM
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- ROAM costs 0.35% less per year.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; ROAM uses index tracking.
- ROAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $106M |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.8% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.21% | 14.41% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMSF and ROAM
Explore further