Screener
ENDW vs GVAL
Cambria Endowment Style ETF vs Cambria Global Value ETF
Key differences
- ENDW costs 0.44% less per year.
- GVAL is significantly larger than ENDW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENDW is classified as alternative, while GVAL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ENDW follows a multi strategy strategy; GVAL uses active selection.
- GVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENDW | GVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $541M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +37.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.19% | 14.47% |
| Max drawdown | -6.44% | -47.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENDW and GVAL
Explore further