Screener
ENHI vs IMF
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
Both ENHI and IMF are alternative ETFs. ENHI charges 0.27% a year and IMF 0.65%. The main difference: ENHI follows a active selection strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
- ENHI follows a active selection strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
- ENHI costs 0.38% less per year.
- IMF is much larger than ENHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $304M |
| Since | 2026 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | active selection | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.60% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -15.10% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.