Screener
ENHI vs ISMF
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
Both ENHI and ISMF are alternative ETFs. ENHI charges 0.27% a year and ISMF 0.80%. The main difference: ENHI follows a active selection strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
- ENHI follows a active selection strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
- ENHI covers global markets excluding the US; ISMF covers global markets.
- ENHI costs 0.53% less per year.
- ISMF is much larger than ENHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $59M |
| Since | 2026 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.49% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | active selection | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.02% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -4.23% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.