Screener
ISMF vs BFLX
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
ISMF is an alternative ETF, while BFLX is an equity ETF. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and BFLX 0.40%.
- ISMF is an alternative fund, while BFLX is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- BFLX costs 0.40% less per year.
- ISMF is much larger than BFLX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $11M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -3.88% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.